Saturday, October 24, 2015

Jennifer Bartlett - Painter

In the early 1980s, while working on my fine arts degree, and for some reasons I wouldn't understand until much later in my life, I became mesmerized by the art of Jennifer Bartlett. I saw her first series of paintings, "In the Garden", featured in a printed arts magazine. Her work was strangely fascinating. The colours, the impressionistic strokes, the play of light dancing across the landscape and that mysteriously-empty fountain with the cherub statue, painted again and again from so many different angles and perspectives. What did it mean? What was she trying to tell us? My curiosity about her work surprised me. Usually, I found contemporary art pieces rather boring and obvious, as simplistic reflections of modern life. I was already experiencing modern reality first-hand. I could see it all around me. And feel it. Why would I ever want to examine a crafted substitute?

Until recently, I hadn't thought about Jennifer Bartlett's work for years. But with renewed interest (and the help of Google) I discovered that one of her recent exhibits involves painting maps. She started out as a map maker. In her work I think there are elements that hint at what I believe may be 'first principles' of perception and cognition. Fundamental clues about how we see and understand the world. Timeless.

In the words of critic Maurice Berger, Bartlett’s art “juxtaposes the raw and the cooked, examining the way the world is filtered through the human mind and is encoded into cultural conventions or sign systems.”


Jennifer Bartlett Fibonacci 1-987, 2010 enamel over silkscreen grid on baked enamel, steel plates 63" x 63" (160 cm x 160 cm), overall installed (artnews.org)

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Our Minds Understand Arrangements as Singular Entities

Our minds understand arrangements - literally, a range of variants as a single object. We know and accept that within a certain bounded range of possibilities, certain transformations are possible and acceptable for a shape. For example, a circle retains its identity to us even across a range of transformations. Escher understood this and demonstrated it in his artwork time and again. Any shape or form can exist and still retain its identity to us within a bounded range of possible transformations if strongly anchored around a core prototype shape or form. What we understand to be ONE object, one shape, one form, is actually a quantum field of variants surrounding a core prototype, an exemplar.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

The arrangement of physical matter is driven by the requirement to conserve energy, to maintain a state that costs the least amount of energy.

The patterns in nature that we resonate to - that are "pleasing" to us, may very well be optimized arrangements of physical matter with ideal energy configurations.

Geometric structures may perhaps be optimal configurations for the distribution of energy and matter that do not ever actually exist exactly in nature.

Mental structures, too, may follow energy conservation principles.

Energy conservation in a physical world of patterned matter.
Nature is efficient.

Monday, November 14, 2011

The Art of Science

Stunning natural and man-made patterns.

http://www.princeton.edu/artofscience/gallery2011/index.php%3Fp=1.html

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Patterns of Movement


This is some very interesting research regarding patterns of movement in natural and virtual environments by Patrick Laube in Zurich, Switzerland.
http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~plaube/

I would imagine the shape of the "terrain" must influence movement pattterns quite significantly.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Pattern Makers as Copycats of Nature?

What does it mean to make something? When we make a pattern out of some materials, aren't we just recreating a pattern that already exists in our physical world, in nature? Are pattern makers really just copycats? We are, but there's something more to our abilities...we can arrange and rearrange patterns to result in entirely new configurations.

Thoughts of Biomimicry...

Monday, March 1, 2010

Harmonic Resonance Theory

http://www.miqel.com/jazz_music_heart/vibrational-truth.html


Fascinating theory by Steven Lehar....
http://sharp.bu.edu/~slehar/webstuff/hr1/hr2.html
It struck me this morning that in a world filled with standing and travelling wave fields, there is no such thing as one of anything, just greater and lesser variations of peaks and troughs within a defined field.